09 November, 2009

Adamorobe Sign Language

Update (later in the day): Please read comment by Annelies Kusters - it provides much more correct and updated information.  You can find more info on her blog: http://adamorobe-valley.blogspot.com/


After digging through the entire SIT library at the University of Ghana, Legon for an Independent Study Project (ISP) that another student supposedly once wrote about their experiences learning Twi in Ghana (which I never did find), I came across someone's ISP about Adamorobe Sign Language. I had never heard of it before. After reading the ISP about it, I almost wanted to cry. Or throw something.

Here's what I learned from the ISP (I haven't actually done this research myself and I definitely don't have the internet time to do so, so you'll just have to deal with my second-hand frustration based on what this other student found during her research). Adamarobe is a village near Mampong in Ghana, notable for its great farms and female chief (a very rare thing in Ghana). It is also notable for its sign language. Adamorobe Sign Language developed within the community, possibly as far back as the 17th century, independent of the introduction of American Sign Language (which developed into Ghanaian Sign Language) by an African-American missionary within the last fifty years or so. The community has a genetic propensity for deafness, and reportedly up to 60% of the population may have been deaf at one time. In 1961 it was reported to be 10%. Now it is less than 2% (with the majority of those who are deaf being over 40). Why?

In the early 1970s, a team of Ghanaian and European doctors and scientists went into the village and discovered that the high incidence of deafness in the community was caused by an "abnormal gene" and gave their expert advice ("genetic counsel") to not allow deaf people to marry other deaf people.

Previously, the entire community was one: deaf and hearing seamlessly joined. All deaf members of the community were just as productive and welcomed as the hearing members. It was accepted and not considered "abnormal." There was a school for deaf children within the community, even.

Now, there are less than five children who are deaf (or there were 7 years ago when this ISP was done). The school has closed. All the deaf children have to travel to Mampong to the deaf school there, where they must then learn an entirely new language: Ghanaian Sign Language in order to get their education. Eligible young deaf men have difficulty finding wives (hearing, as is the law), because there is a commonly held belief that they will only produce deaf offspring. Deaf women don't seem to have such difficulty, as they are believed to be able to produce hearing children just fine. There is now a strong stigma attached to being deaf as the community tries to rid itself of the label "deaf village," which it has had for so long, and now perceives as negative.

And the language? Well, what hope does it have if there is no longer going to be a need for it, as the community does what it thinks is best for itself and continues to eliminate deafness from its population? It's clearly endangered. It's also not even listed as a language of Ghana (at least not on ethnologue's map of "the languages of Ghana" that I printed up as a reference one day in Kumasi... it is hard not having the internet at my fingertips).

I'm most frustrated just by the fact that someone (some people) had the nerve to go into a community and tell them in their professional opinion that they weren't beautiful. That they were abnormal. That there was something wrong with them and they needed to do something drastic to change it. What?? And now, thirty years later, the damage has been done and probably is permanent. The entire community's attitude towards its deaf population has changed.

I have to go get lunch and finish my pre-ISP research at the library before I leave tomorrow morning. Ghana is still beautiful!

3 comments:

  1. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hello!

    Someone sent me your blog article and I would like to make some comments. I’m an anthropologist who resided in Adamorobe for 8 months and I only just returned a few weeks ago. I know the study that you are citing - that person has done a short small-scaled research and some of the information in her thesis is not entirely accurate.

    At this very moment, Adamorobe counts 42 deaf people aged between 1 and 75. Many people state that the deaf population decreased, although there is no evidence that 60% was deaf in the past. There are 12 (so not ‘less than 5’ ) deaf children (aged 1-18). Half of the deaf population (not the majority) is older than 40. The school in the community was there for 6 years only (in the seventies) and was closed for multiple reasons. There were several other attempts to educate the deaf but all those attempts failed.

    It is true that the village’s chief in 1975 passed a law that deaf could not marry deaf anymore and that this still causes a lot of frustration amongst the deaf people (although some are in a relationship with each other anyway). But it is not clear if and to what extent this was influenced by genetic counseling. None of the village elders that I interviewed about this law, could remember this counseling and if I asked for the reasons for the law, they replied mainly that they saw that the deaf population was increasing and they wanted to stop this for several reasons.

    Although it is true that Adamorobe’s people state that deaf and hearing people were ‘more close’ in the past, it seems too romanticising to state that “previously, the entire community was one: deaf and hearing seamlessly joined.” And also “there is now a strong stigma attached to being deaf” has to be nuanced. It is true that they try to prevent deaf births, but during interviews with hearing people also many of them stated that it is not up to them to control the births of deaf people, but “God’s decision”. Overally, through observation and interviewing, I got the impression that hearing people generally happily accept the presence of deaf people, but that there is - because of the law - a stigma to producing new deaf children through deaf couples. It is still possible that the deaf population grows because also hearing people get deaf children, although it is true that the deaf population would be larger if deaf marriages were allowed, and it is also true that Adamorobe sign language is potentially endangered because the schoolchildren use another sign language as their first language.

    Whilst you write that “And now, thirty years later, the damage has been done and probably is permanent”, I would like to comment that the situation was much more complex. The essence is true: the relationship between deaf and hearing people has changed throughout the last decennia but not because of one single reason (ie. Genetic counseling). Of influence were the marriage law, but also migrations into the village, conflicts with a neighbouring ethnic group, donations of NGO’s who favoured the deaf people only, increase of individualism, different chief’s policies, ... I’m only just starting the process of analysing my data... :)

    Cheers!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Annelies,

    Thank you for the detailed response! That's a lot of really interesting information about the situation - far more than what was in that 20-page, 7-year-old ISP that I read. Thank you for correcting the information, also.

    I wish you the best with analysing your data. That can be daunting :) I'd definitely be interested in hearing more about your fieldwork.

    ReplyDelete